LeCoqRoti
Three unique generals replace the original Super Strike, each bringing passive and active abilities that reshape the battlefield. The expansion adds fresh missions to the existing campaign arc, along with new units and structures for the USA, China, and the GLA.
Generals system — pick one of three commanders per faction before a match; their specialisations unlock exclusive units, upgrades, and tactical powers unavailable to the standard arsenal.
Campaign structure — a linear sequence of operations where base-building, resource gathering, and unit training form the core loop; several missions bypass capturing bases entirely and focus on surgical strikes with a fixed force.
Faction additions — the USA fields advanced drone technology and electronic warfare, China receives heavy assault infantry and propaganda tools, the GLA gains stealth demolition options and toxin-based weaponry.
Similar games: where it sits on the Mac RTS shelf
Compared with StarCraft, the difference is one of temperament. StarCraft rewards tight build orders and mechanical precision; Generals rewards improvisation with a smaller unit count and a battlefield that changes shape quickly. The command points system in the expansion pushes you toward holding territory rather than turtling, so a match often feels closer to a series of raids than a single long siege.
Against Company of Heroes, the contrast is more philosophical. Company of Heroes models cover, suppression, and directional armour; Generals keeps the model abstract. A tank has hit points, not a facing. That simplicity is not a flaw — it means the camera stays on the map, not on micromanaging unit posture. For a player who likes the rhythm of Company of Heroes but wants to think about base layout rather than squad cover, Generals sits in a comfortable middle ground.
Beside Total Annihilation or its spiritual successors, the economy here is deliberately thin. You gather supplies, you build, you fight. There is no secondary resource to balance, no upgrade tree that spans twenty minutes. The expansion leans into that economy of attention: fewer systems, faster contact with the enemy, and a shorter route from opening build to first meaningful engagement.
The first days: a practical sequence
The interface is English, so the first hour is mostly about learning where things live. A sensible order looks like this:
- Run one skirmish per faction. Do not read the manual first. Pick a general, build a supply centre, and let the tech tree reveal itself through play. Each faction teaches its own tempo.
- Try the same map three times. Once with a balanced opening, once with early aggression, once with a delayed push. The map knowledge matters more than faction choice in the first sessions.
- Watch a replay of your own match. The game records the decisions you did not notice making. A single replay usually shows two or three build-order mistakes.
- Set a skirmish against one AI difficulty below your instinct. The campaign difficulty does not prepare you for skirmish pacing, and the AI here punishes idle harvesters quickly.
Factions that feel less symmetrical: returning players get clarity
The players who enjoy this most tend to be those who already know the original and want the factions to feel less symmetrical. The general system gives each match a clearer identity from the first minute, so returning players get a faster sense of variety than the base game offered.
Mac users with older Intel machines also find the package agreeable. The requirements are modest, and the Wineskin wrapper means the game runs in an environment closer to its original Windows behaviour without asking much from the host system. For someone with a secondary Mac kept for older software, this is a natural fit.
The third group is the patient skirmish player. Someone who likes to test a single map against several AI personalities, adjusting one variable at a time, will find the general selection gives those repeated matches a reason to continue. The same map with a different general is not the same match.
Camera edge speed on trackpad: reduce it before the first session
The default settings are serviceable, but a few adjustments improve the experience before the first real session:
- Camera edge speed. Reduce it slightly. The default is tuned for a Windows mouse setup; on a Mac trackpad it feels a shade too eager.
- Right-click behaviour. If the game offers the option, set right-click to deselect rather than issue move orders, until the muscle memory from other RTS titles settles.
- Scroll wheel zoom. Widen the zoom range if the interface permits. The new units are visually distinct at a medium distance, and you will want to read a battlefield quickly before committing a general's active ability.
- Sound mix. Lower the music a touch and keep unit acknowledgements high. The audio cues are genuinely useful; the music is not.
Those who prefer to adjust the wrapper itself can look at the Wineskin settings, but the in-game menu covers most day-to-day comfort. The rest is learned in the field.
In short: a focused expansion that swaps the original superweapon mechanic for personality-driven generals and extends the faction rosters with tactically distinct hardware.
Correspondence 0
Take a chair or join the table to send a letter.
No correspondence on this note yet. Letters are read before they appear.